The following types of licensing practices have been found to be contrary to US antitrust law: Requiring a licensee to purchase separate unpatented products as a condition of obtaining the license for a patented product; Requiring mandatory package licensing; Forming a cartel through exclusive cross-licensing; Using a patent, trademark or trade secret as the basis for an agreement that restrains where, how or to whom a patented product is disposed of in the US after the licenser or licensee has sold the product to an independent purchaser; Agreeing in relation to a license that no further licenses will be granted to a third party without the licensee's consent; Requiring a licensee to adhere to any specified or minimum price for the licensee's sale of the licensed products; Insisting as a condition of the license that the licensee pay royalties in an amount not reasonably related to the licensee's sale of products covered by the licensed rights; Attempting to enforce a patent license or collect a royalty beyond the term of the patent (the same reasoning could apply to attempts to enforce or collect royalties on a license based on know-how that has entered the public domain); and Requiring a licensee to agree in advance to grant back to the licenser title or an exclusive license on any new patents or trade secrets related to the licensed technology rights that the licensee may obtain or develop.

下列許可行為被認(rèn)為違反了美國(guó)反壟斷法：●要求被許可方購(gòu)買另外非專利產(chǎn)品作為獲得某一專利產(chǎn)品許可的條件；以強(qiáng)制性一攬子方式提供許可玖玖资源网日本在线视频；通過(guò)獨(dú)占交叉許可組建一個(gè)企業(yè)聯(lián)盟；利用一項(xiàng)專利免费试看黄色网站，商標(biāo)或商業(yè)秘密作為協(xié)議的基礎(chǔ)国产一级爱c在线大片，在許可方或被許可方將某一專利產(chǎn)品賣給一位獨(dú)立買家后，限制該產(chǎn)品在美國(guó)的處理地點(diǎn)韩国日本ww色成年免费网站，方式和交易對(duì)象影音先锋最新av资源；規(guī)定某一許可在未獲被許可方同意的情況下，不再向任何第三方發(fā)放許可婷婷五月综合网中文综合网；要求被許可方在銷售其獲得許可的產(chǎn)品時(shí)遵守特定的或最低價(jià)格在线欧美h；對(duì)于銷售受許可權(quán)利保護(hù)的產(chǎn)品，要求被許可方支付不合理的特許權(quán)使用費(fèi)在线观看午夜国产猫咪影院视频，并以此作為獲得許可的條件国产色色一级免费视频；試圖超出專利范圍強(qiáng)加一項(xiàng)專利許可或?qū)ζ涫杖√卦S權(quán)使用費(fèi)(同一理由可適用于試圖根據(jù)已進(jìn)入公共領(lǐng)域的技術(shù)秘密強(qiáng)加一項(xiàng)專利許可或?qū)ζ涫杖√卦S權(quán)使用費(fèi))；以及對(duì)于被許可方可能獲得或擁有的與被許可技術(shù)權(quán)利相關(guān)的任何新專利或商業(yè)秘密欧美AAAA色，要求被許可方事先同意向許可方回授有關(guān)權(quán)利或?qū)僭S可wwwwⅹⅹxx。

In this chapter,on the base of discussingcomprehensively the three subjects of the Adversary Principle,andcombining with the practice of the reform of the civil trial style,thewriter holds that the non-binding Adversary Principle that is beingpracticed for the time being in our country is not the Adversary Principleof its essence,and it should be changed to be the binding standard to boththe court and the parties.On this,the writer have given the followingdefinite suggestions:First,the parties' claim acts should be controlledunder the law,and cannot be exercised for the objectives of delaying theproceedings or raising the action cost,otherwise will suffer losing hisright,or will be punished economically;Second,in order to reflectthe fairness of the action,and prevent the delay of the process,in thecivil procedure field of our country the timely evidence producism shouldbe carried out and implemented,and the evidence-production deadlinesystem should also be set up.Furthermore,to the parties that produceevidence out of time,hewill be deprived of attack and defense,orwill be given certain economic sanctions; Third,scientific admissionsystem should be set up,and to the admission withdrawal or statementscontradictory to the admission,should give legal restrictions orprohibitions.

本章中，作者在全面論述辯論原則三大命題的基礎(chǔ)上中文字幕亚洲图片，結(jié)合我國(guó)民事審判方式改革的實(shí)踐福利午夜国产一区二区三区，認(rèn)為我國(guó)目前推行的非約束性辯論原則并非本質(zhì)意義上的辯論原則，應(yīng)將其轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)閷?duì)法院和當(dāng)事人的約束性規(guī)范原則欧美日韩口爆吞精一二区，并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了如下具體建議：第一91色偷偷色噜噜狠狠网站，當(dāng)事人主張行為應(yīng)受法律控制，不得以拖延訴訟老师挤奶水A片无码网站、增加訴訟成本等為目的予以實(shí)施GOGO人体无码视频私拍，否則將遭受失權(quán)效或經(jīng)濟(jì)上的訴訟制裁；第二国产黄片免费看看，為體現(xiàn)訴訟公平免费人城网站在线观看，防止訴訟遲延，在我國(guó)民事訴訟領(lǐng)域應(yīng)當(dāng)推行和貫徹證據(jù)的適時(shí)提出主義一本久久，設(shè)置具有法律后果的舉證時(shí)效制度露出在线，并對(duì)當(dāng)事人違反舉證時(shí)效制度的提供證據(jù)行為采取或取消其攻擊防御方法，或課以其一定經(jīng)濟(jì)性制裁的懲罰措施毛片全部免费播放无码；第三欧美A∨在线精品，設(shè)定科學(xué)的自認(rèn)制度操操操操干干干干干，對(duì)撤銷自認(rèn)或與自認(rèn)相抵觸的陳述應(yīng)給予法律上的限制或禁止。